Ludia Forums

Aquatic Ideas/New Dino Ideas

#1

If aquatics are coming, let’s hear some dino and hybrid ideas!
Let’s hear some new dino ideas too!

#2

Aquatics: Mosasaurus, Megalodon, Icthyosaurus, Plesieosaurus, Giant Nautilus

Land Dinos: Metriacanthosaurus, Giganotosaurus, Sauropod Unique, Styracosaurus, Corythosaurus, Lambeosaurus, Compsognathus, Crylophosaurus

3 Likes
#3

Mauisaurus defintiely. It’s like a underwater long neck

1 Like
#4

Land dinos:
Troodon
Metriacanthosaurus
Torosaurus
Deinonychus
Struthiomimus
Stegoceras
Prenocephale

Aquatics: DEFINITELY NO!

1 Like
#5

Latenivenatrix, not Troodon?

#6

Here’s a lot

Aquatic:
Plesiosaurs: Pliosaurus, Plesiosaurus, Rhomaleosaurus
Mosasaurs: Mosasaurus, Tylosaurus, Platecarpus, Ichthyosaurus
Pachycormids: Leedsichthys
Ichthyodectiformes: Xiphactinus
Nothosaurs: Nothosaurus

Terrestrial:
Alvarezsaurids: Shuvuuia, Mononykus
Oviraptorosaurs: Gigantoraptor, Oviraptor
Aves: Balaur bondoc, Archaeopteryx
Therizinosaurs: Nanshiungosaurus
Rebacchisaurids: Nigersaurus, Rebacchisaurus
Diplodocids: Barosaurus, Supersaurus, Amphicoelias
Troodontids: Sinovenator, Mei
Ankylosaurids: Zuul
Nodosaurids: Edmontonia
Ornithomimosaurs: Pelecanimimus, Sinornithosaurus
?: Chilesaurus
Hadrosaurids: Hadrosaurus, Corythosaurus
Titanosaurs: Titanosaurus, Isisaurus
Allosauroids: Giganotosaurus

Pterosaurs:
Rhamphorhynchids: Rhamphorhynchus, Dorygnathus
Anurognathids: Anurognathus

I put a lot so there is a guaranteed chance for one of them to make it. Likely everything after the Aquatics have a 0% chance of being added in 1.7.

4 Likes
#7

My original post got deleted when I refreshed… :sob:

#8

Well… if I must…
Megoladon. Obviously.
And one I can’t spell… helacorprion… saw blade shark guy thingy…

1 Like
#9

Megalodon? Mosasaurs, Plesiosaurs and such I can deal with, cause they were lizards, but if they add fish in this, it will be pretty stupid.

2 Likes
#10

Personally, I don’t really want aquatic creatures to be added at all lol
There is so much to be fixed and so much more to be done with land creatures… not to mention that the flying creatures we have now are still an absolute disaster, with not a single one being relevant :sweat_smile:

2 Likes
#11

Marine reptiles yes, but please not anything else. Just as we don’t need cenozoic mammals.

2 Likes
#12

We already have a huge selection of aquatic dinosaurs in game. Just read the description of dinosaurs.

But sharks yes please. They were around when dinosaurs lived they are fair game in my book.

With that said

Sharks:

The weird one with toothed dorsal fin
Megaladon
The saw toothed one.

Arthropods
The sea scorpions x2
Giant Nautilus

Sea Dino’s
Pleasiasaurus
Mosasaurus
Ichtyasaurus

I put them in groups of three so we could have common rare and epic.

#13

I honestly don’t have a problem with aquatics themselves. If they are implemented right, they could make the game much more enjoyable. However, that is only if Ludia doesn’t mess up.

2 Likes
#14

My opinion
marine reptiles:yes
Mammals:no

#15

I know this is the incorrect time period, but we have synapsids in the game so whatever. I want to see Dunkleosteus so bad.

3 Likes
#16

Megalodon is a fish boi

1 Like
#17

That’s what I said

1 Like
#18

I mean sharks have been around longer than trees, much less dinos. I think they deserve one or two in the game

#19

Mosasaurus model:mosa,haino,tylo,prognathodon,plotosaurus,etc.
Shark model:megalodon,helicoprion,stethacanthus,etc.
Ammonite model: ammonite,etc
Dunkle model:dunkleoteus,xiphactinus,etc.

#20

Why nobody said liopleurodon?

And… megalodon? Please, that was a shark, not even a reptile.

Finally, as we have dimetrodon in this game, why not enjoying its evolution, the mighty Gorgonops?

3 Likes