I believe Ludia would tell the truth with survey results. By extension, I believe a fair number of people voted for no change on G2 Indo. I believe people are out there who still approve of it staying the same.
But on this forum, I have never once heard a single argument saying G2 Indo needs no change. Not once. That surprises me. Out of all the varying views I’ve heard on nearly every game issue under the sun, not once.
I understand there is a risk in this post. My concern is that people may say G2 Indo needed no change, and then a horde of unhappy players will bear down on whoever said it with a mob of torches and pitchforks. Please don’t do that, y’all.
So, would anybody like to tell me why G2 Indo should stay the same? Did some people vote “don’t change Cautious Strike, but nerf this other feature” and the specific nerf you voted for didn’t get majority? That happens sometimes. It happens with legal documents sometimes, too. Or are there other factors involved?
Please no venom against Ludia itself or any of the voters, I’m happy with that staying inside the Dilophoboa.