I know that many of you have already taken the survey, but for those who haven’t, please consider the following:
Level 20 sanctuaries are a LOT of work. Many members have invested considerable amounts of money into creatures to level them up for higher sanctuary points. This should not go understated.
So how does this relate to sanctuary care points? You’d think that these players would benefit from their players FIPing on their beast. Yes, that’s true, but this also requires players knowing that placing creatures in sanctuaries gives them less benefit than having level 20s. This proposal make this (somewhat) untrue.
This proposal will create resentment towards those who have max-levelled their sanctuary beasts, it will create competition within alliances and co-ops as to who can place which dinosaurs, and it will ultimately rob players of their “care points” as people will only want to FIP their own creatures. This is a really short-sighted idea, and I’m concerned that people will welcome it with open arms.
The only stipulations I would make is if you allow alliance leaders to remove sanctuaries from their alliances and sanctuary owners to remove rogue placements. Otherwise, this will create a gigantic mess that will cause co-ops to adopt more hard-line stances and create a hostile environment in the game.
The last proposal I felt this sick about when reading about it was boosts. Please think about this before welcoming it.